• 77°

Column: Like Washington’s Mount Vernon in 1797, N.C. is primed for distillery growth

by Jon Sanders

Father of His Nation. Our first president. The New Cincinnatus. First in whiskey. President’s Day started out to celebrate the man behind those titles, George Washington, on his birthday, Feb. 22.

Wait – first in whiskey? Yes. When Washington said farewell to the presidency in 1797, he hired a Scottish immigrant named James Anderson to manage his Mount Vernon estate. Anderson saw a gristmill, plenty of water, rye being used as a cover crop, and one wide-open business opportunity. Washington listened, and by the turn of the 19th century, Washington’s Mount Vernon distillery had quickly become the largest whiskey distillery in the nation.

A century later, neighboring North Carolina had become home to more legal distilleries than any other state in the nation. North Carolina was also the nation’s leader in wine production. State prohibition in 1908 killed those industries off well before federal Prohibition. Distilleries went underground, which, as many Tar Heels know, led to bootlegging, fast cars, daredevil drivers to outrun revenuers, and then NASCAR.

Distilleries didn’t return in 1933, when Prohibition ended, or in 1937, when North Carolina enacted its Alcoholic Beverage Control system to control liquor. It wasn’t until 2005 that North Carolina saw its first legal distillery in almost a full century, and now only about five dozen dot the state. On the other hand, wineries slowly began returning about the same time as Prohibition’s end. Now there are 186 statewide.

Why has one industry returned so strongly while the other hasn’t? Why is North Carolina a regional leader in breweries, with more than 300 now? A big reason is that liquor is more heavily regulated here than other alcoholic beverages.

With North Carolina’s decision to control liquor, the state (ABC Commission) controls the distribution and local governments (ABC boards) control the retail sales in a limited number of government ABC stores. For beer and wine, however, a small group of private wholesalers handle the distribution while sales take place in taverns, bars, grocery stores, convenience stores, specialty shops, etc.

Controlling liquor doesn’t mean people won’t drink. Most people don’t limit themselves to one type of alcohol. Laws that make it harder to get liquor just make people more likely to opt for beer and wine. North Carolina is 13th out of 14 states (including D.C.) in the Southeast in per-capita liquor consumption. But we’re eighth in per-capita beer consumption and fourth in per-capita wine consumption.

According to the American Craft Distillers Council, 92 percent of small distilleries’ sales are in their home state. But here a distillery’s product can’t be sold in ABC stores until the ABC Commission places it on its approved list. That’s still just the start of their quest to reach consumers.

The distiller then has to contact the state’s 170 ABC boards to persuade them to carry their product in their particular stores. That’s a lot of sales calls and costly marketing efforts. Distilleries can’t offer tastings at the ABC stores. They can’t sell bottles at local fairs and farmers’ markets. They can’t ship directly to consumers.

The only way a consumer can get a bottle from an upstart distillery in North Carolina not listed by the ABC Commission is to visit the distillery itself. Even then, you can’t buy more than five bottles in a calendar year. Better be picky about your Christmas giving, I suppose.

Finding a local craft beer or wine is a lot easier, don’t you think?

Right now there’s a lot of chatter that we might see actual reform in North Carolina’s ABC system. That’s not only good news for freedom and for consumers in North Carolina, it’s also good news for our distilleries, their consumers, their future employees, and their communities.

If we let liquor compete here like beer and wine, North Carolina’s craft distillery industry is poised for growth. Like Mount Vernon in 1797, all the components for success are already in place.

Jon Sanders is director of regulatory studies at the conservative John Locke Foundation. This article first appeared in Carolina Journal.

READ MORE COLUMNS AND LETTERS TO THE EDITOR IN OUR OPINION SECTION.

Lifestyles

New bicycle exhibit opens at Roanoke Island Festival Park

Crime

North Carolina man sentenced to five years in prison, three years of supervised release for firearm charge

Crime

Two men dead after interstate shooting in North Carolina

Lifestyles

Hundreds gather to witness release of two sea turtles at Coquina Beach

News

Major North Carolina hospital systems to require staff to get COVID-19 vaccine

News

Firefighters rescue multiple children from North Carolina house fire

Lifestyles

Outer Banks Community Foundation grant deadline nears

Crime

Cooper announces reward for information on Guilford County murder

Lifestyles

Fascinating fasciation: Roanoke Island garden experiences rare phenomenon

Crime

North Carolina man sentenced to over 17 years in prison for soliciting minors for photos

News

Opioid settlement: North Carolina’s share could be $750M

News

Cooper moves to end North Carolina’s statewide mask mandate

Crime

Uber driver charged with kidnapping, sexually assaulting customer in North Carolina

News

Convenience store stop for gas, hot dog and scratch-off tickets yields $200,000 prize for North Carolina man

Crime

North Carolina man sentenced to over 17 years in prison for stabbing detention center guard

News

Kitty Hawk trail connector a team effort

News

Former North Carolina Rep. Melanie Goodwin remembered as a trailblazer

Crime

North Carolina man sentenced to 10 years in prison for ammunition charge

Business

COA receives donation from Paul Mann Custom Boats, Inc.

Business

Willie Mae Overton celebrated for 60 years with Elizabeth City hospital

Lifestyles

Dare County holding back to school COVID-19 vaccine clinics

Lifestyles

Christmas in July event coming to Kill Devil Hills

News

Dare County update on COVID-19

Crime

NC court rules magistrate can be sued for damages over misdirected commitment paperwork